<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New AdWords Formula: Better quality, or more profit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tillison.co.uk/2007/08/09/adwords-formula-quality-or-profit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tillison.co.uk/2007/08/09/adwords-formula-quality-or-profit/</link>
	<description>Tillison Consulting: it&#039;s about you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:15:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdWords Top Placement: Your Advantage</title>
		<link>http://tillison.co.uk/2007/08/09/adwords-formula-quality-or-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>AdWords Top Placement: Your Advantage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tillison.34sp.com/2007/08/09/adwords-formula-quality-or-profit/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] I was a little sceptical about this change, and I still am. As Google suggests in its post, we&#8217;ll have to monitor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was a little sceptical about this change, and I still am. As Google suggests in its post, we&#8217;ll have to monitor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdWords Top Placement: Your Advantage &#171; About Business Development</title>
		<link>http://tillison.co.uk/2007/08/09/adwords-formula-quality-or-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>AdWords Top Placement: Your Advantage &#171; About Business Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tillison.34sp.com/2007/08/09/adwords-formula-quality-or-profit/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] Top Placement: Your&#160;Advantage    Initially, I was a little sceptical about this change, and I still am. As Google suggests in it&#8217;s post, we&#8217;ll have to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top Placement: Your&nbsp;Advantage    Initially, I was a little sceptical about this change, and I still am. As Google suggests in it&#8217;s post, we&#8217;ll have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InternetMarketingAdvice.net &#187; Goole (I left off the last &#8220;g&#8221; for GREED)</title>
		<link>http://tillison.co.uk/2007/08/09/adwords-formula-quality-or-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>InternetMarketingAdvice.net &#187; Goole (I left off the last &#8220;g&#8221; for GREED)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tillison.34sp.com/2007/08/09/adwords-formula-quality-or-profit/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] post on Tillison Consulting&#8217;s blog titled, &#8220;New Adwords Formula: Better quality of more profit?&#8221; explains the issue very well. It&#8217;s like someone at Google saw a loophole and said, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post on Tillison Consulting&#8217;s blog titled, &#8220;New Adwords Formula: Better quality of more profit?&#8221; explains the issue very well. It&#8217;s like someone at Google saw a loophole and said, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

